PM → MOO 9:10 — Grade Explorer v2.2

Tradeoff explorer · 2025-11-17 → 2026-05-11 · $1K/pos × ETF tier (capped 1.5x) · MAX_POS=15

Cross-threshold comparison

Threshold Trades Days Avg picks/d Days at 15 PnL_H total Avg/day Per-trade Sharpe WR_H MaxDD$ 95% CI Sh
>= C1,59712013.377$+2,815$+23.5$+1.762.5752%$-1,361[-0.2, 5.4]
>= B1,40412011.755$+2,558$+21.3$+1.822.3352%$-1,503[-0.4, 5.1]
>= B+1,39012011.654$+2,667$+22.2$+1.922.4752%$-1,419[-0.3, 5.3]
>= A1,29812010.847$+2,536$+21.1$+1.952.3452%$-1,445[-0.4, 5.2]
= A+6181135.516$+2,889$+25.6$+4.683.5557%$-609[0.6, 6.7]
How to read this table: ">= B+" includes B+ AND A AND A+ (the current production default). "= A+" is A+ only — strictest, fewest trades. All thresholds capped at MAX_POS=15/day; ties broken by score.

Verdict — scaling vs stability

Faster scaling (max $$$/period)

1. = A+$+2,889 · Sh 3.55
2. >= C$+2,815 · Sh 2.57
3. >= B+$+2,667 · Sh 2.47
4. >= B$+2,558 · Sh 2.33
5. >= A$+2,536 · Sh 2.34
Choose if you have BP headroom and want to deploy maximum capital — more trades = more compound surface.

More stable (Sharpe / DD% ratio)

1. = A+stab 2.93 · DD% 21.1%
2. >= Cstab 1.73 · DD% 48.4%
3. >= B+stab 1.62 · DD% 53.2%
4. >= Astab 1.49 · DD% 57.0%
5. >= Bstab 1.47 · DD% 58.8%
Choose if you want highest Sharpe per unit drawdown — fewer, higher-conviction trades, but limited compound capacity.
Practical recommendation:

Inspect one threshold

ETF tier breakdown

Quartile stability (full 6m)

QPeriodDaysPnL_HSharpeWR_H

Daily breakdown

DateNTierWR_HPnL_HCum_H